Thursday, April 15, 2010

The gospel in three parts . . . times three

Before reading any further, answer this question: What is the gospel?

You didn’t do it, did you? You just kept reading. Bad reader. Return to line one.

Thanks.

Many Christians go into blushed silence when asked to articulate the good news of God’s reign. However, if we are to be cracked pots spilling out this glorious message, the gospel must be understood and lived. To that end, let’s look at three unique, yet interrelated biblical images of the gospel.

• First, Paul describes the gospel as rooted in the historical event of the three-part passion of Jesus: “For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” (1 Corinthians 15:3-4).

To begin, the gospel is about the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus. It is historically enacted and foretold. The gospel is deed and word. The good news is the culminating event of God’s declared commitment to transform the dust and grime of the world.

• Second, Paul describes three radical implications of this gospel event. He begins with our own resurrection: “[B]ecause of his great love for us, God who is rich in mercy made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions” (Ephesians 2:4-5).

This results in our participation in God’s renovation of the world: “[W]e are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works which God prepared in advance for us to do” (Ephesians 2:10).

And, further, the gospel event ushers in reconciliation: “For he himself is our peace, who has made the two [Jew and gentile] one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility” (Ephesians 2:14).

The gospel event of Easter brings with it the implications of resurrection (new life for those dead in sin), renovation (our participation in God’s work in the world), and reconciliation (our becoming a new people defined not by our ethnicities or traditions, but by Jesus).

• Third, to the Corinthians seeking to understand how to function as a “good news people,” Paul erupts poetically in the “love chapter.” Sadly misused at most weddings, I Corinthians 13 is primarily about how the church lives out the good news. Paul declares: “[N]ow these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love” (1 Corinthians 13:13).

The gospel, founded on the historical Easter event and implying the transforming implications of resurrection, renovation and reconciliation, is now brought to its climax. How do we live this out? In three parts:

• First, by clinging in faith to what happened according to the Scriptures and sharing that with our world unashamedly.

• Second, by offering the hope of God’s good works to our world to initiate now what will one day be fulfilled.

• Third, and most gloriously, by expressing this the same way God expressed himself to us: through love.

So, what is the gospel? It is the historical event of Easter in three parts: the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus. It is the radical implications that event entails in three parts: resurrection, renovation and reconciliation. And it is the way we live it out in three parts: faith and hope, all crowned, salted, expressed and sourced in love.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

That's good. Although I would disagree (or at least clarify because I don't think we disagree at all) at one point.

I think it's massively important to separate the gospel from it's effects.
So while I agree wholeheartedly with your definition of the gospel, I take issue with your last paragraph:

"So, what is the gospel? It is the historical event of Easter in three parts: the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus. It is the radical implications that event entails in three parts: resurrection, renovation and reconciliation. And it is the way we live it out in three parts: faith and hope, all crowned, salted, expressed and sourced in love."

I would change that to say

...It necessitates three radical implications...And if we believe it we must live a life of faith and hope...

Because whatever else the gospel is, it is not how we live.

That is to say, "Love the Lord your God with all you heart, with all your soul, with all your mind and with all your strength, and your neighbour as yourself." is not, in any way, the gospel.

The gospel makes loving God and neighbour possible.

The reason that's important, is that it's exactly there that we get the gospel wrong, and turn it into another version of behaving ourselves so God loves us (or, for the believer, so God loves us more.)

It's a particular Anabaptist blind spot, I think. and for exactly the same reason everyone has blind spots.
When we emphasize something that we think others miss, we can tend to over emphasize that point to our detriment.

So,I may be nit-picking, but I think it's important to say that we live out the effects of the gospel, or the implications of the gospel. But the only one who ever lived the gospel is Christ. And He only lived it once, and then it was done.

Having said all that...I would add this; unless we understand that the proper response to the gospel is one of service in love, then I don't think we understand or believe the gospel at all, because if we understood and believed it, we would be changed.

Stuart Blyde said...

Wow.

Guys, maybe this might help. I have had a real wake-me-up this week and I have no idea how I'm going to "live it out."

I realize that I have come, like so many, to be a 'churchy' guy. I say I don't like to point fingers at those who 'don't get it,' but then I point all ten with my teeth gritted. Why I grit my teeth, I realize, is that I seek (truth be told, and it hurts to say it) to appear feeling bad about it. In fact, I must realize that I don't. I'm doing the same thing as the Pharisee pointing at the tax collector.

Lately I've taken aim at some marriages that are crumbling within our church and have attributed this angrily with self-centredness and lack of belief. I have spent a good portion of time looking at things that are wrong with the world and it has only served to make me angry and spiteful and 'churchy.' I have been pretty self-righteous lately and I should like to repent.

I don't know the circumstances of half of the people I judge, and am probably wrong in judging the other half. If anyone needs to be judged, it's me. So, that said, I will say that in order to train people to discern counterfeit money, the government sets them handling and learning everything about REAL money. They get to know the real thing so well, that they are never fooled by the 'almost genuine.'

I think that for a while, I'm going to spend time emulating my Saviour, the REAL thing, for a while. That means allowing the real gospel to fill me with love for others, instead of letting my knowledge of what's wrong guide me to try and root it out. Because, while I'm rooting, hearts are breaking.

You've both added some powerful truth to my life today. May God continue to break our hearts for his glory.

Stuart Blyde said...

I should say, I'll be spending my time hopefully from now on, not just for a while, setting my eyes upon Jesus and trying to emulate him. Oops. Little slip there...